home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 1994 10:27:06 +0100
- From: Gerd Castan <castan@cip.physik.uni-stuttgart.de>
- To: gem-list@world.std.com
- Message-Id: <0097FEF8.643D6A00.19865@cip.physik.uni-stuttgart.de>
- Subject: RE: Ofir's digest 13.06
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- Hi Ofir and *,
-
- >>> CTRL F - Find
- >>> CTRL G - Find next
- >>> Shift CTRL G - Find previous
- >>> CTRL R - Replace
- >>> CTRL T - Replace Next
- >>> Shift CTRL T - Replace previous
- >>
- >>Now _why_ make this take more entries than really necessary?
- >
- >An application does not have to implement these. The guidelines only say
- >that should you wish to implement these then use the above shortcuts.
- Yes. But the guidelines should be as easy as possible for the user.
-
- Easy is: to drop CTRL T and Shift CTRL T. We can save this shortcut for
- other tasks.
- Remember that we don't have enough easy shortcuts!
-
- Then we have
- CTRL F Find
- CTRL R Replace
- CTRL G Find/Replace next
- Shift CTRL G Find/Replace previous
-
- Shift CTRL G could be ommited too, since you are in a dialog after pressing
- CTRL F or CTRL R where you have to say if it's case sensitive, if you
- want to find/replace all etc.
- We could define the direction there. On the other hand it was to dangerous
- to use Shift CTRL G for another task.
-
- >
- >Ofir ogal@cix.compulink.co.uk
- Gerd
-
-